The allegation that driving is "subsidised" is a non-argument anyway. No-one pays for a driver's car purchase or depreciation or insurance or fuel or repairs and maintenance. Why should the taxpayer subsidise almost all of these things for transit riders - direct subsidies in most cases being 75 to 98%? The most adventurous calculations of the "subsidies" to car driving show them to be around 5% to 10%.
driver san francisco car mods
2ff7e9595c
Comments